In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, vincent wehren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tim Daneliuk wrote: > > Steve Holden wrote: > > > >> Roland Heiber wrote: > >> > >>> Tim Daneliuk wrote: > >>> > > Aha! Exactly ... and that makes perfect sense too. D'oh! I guess a > > better > > distribution strategy would be to have the installation program generate > > the pyo > > file at installation time... > > > > Thanks - > > Also, the *.py? files contain the full pathname of the *.py they have > been compiled from. True. > Copying them to other path locations will give you > the wrong __file___ information in tracebacks. This is not 100% accurate: yes, the traceback shows the original source file path, yet module.__file__ does point to the actual .pyc file it was loaded from. Just -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
