Fuzzyman schreef:

> Shame as it is a *very* nice IDE, but it had too many quirks (with
> little chance of them being fixed it seemed) to use it for commercial
> development at Resolver.

I've never head from a company called Resolver. A commercial company
can not assume if it picks up a free project that it will get free
support comparable to commercial support. If however they would be
willing to pay a fair amount for fixing these quirks, they would have
not only helped themselves but anyone who uses SPE. No shame, no blame.

Stani

http://pythonide.stani.be

-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
  • Re: SPE for 2.5? SPE - Stani's Python Editor
    • Re: SPE for 2.5? SPE - Stani's Python Editor

Reply via email to