Paul Boddie wrote:
> Kay Schluehr wrote:
>> Spreading tiny function definitions all over the code
>> may be finally not such a good idea compared with a few generic methods
>> that get just called? OO might run out of fashion these days but Python
>> is not Java and Pythons OO is pretty lightweight.
>
> I think you've successfully identified a recent trend in Python
> development: the abandonment of fairly transparent object-oriented
> techniques in favour of more opaque but supposedly more convenient
> hybrid techniques.
Just for the record : Ruby's code-blocks (closures, really) come from
Smalltalk, which is still the OneTrueObjectLanguage(tm).
--
bruno desthuilliers
python -c "print '@'.join(['.'.join([w[::-1] for w in p.split('.')]) for
p in '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.split('@')])"
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
