Alexey Borzenkov wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > but maybe it reduces code readabilty a bit for people > > that have just started to program: > > > > mul2 = def(a, b): > > return a * b > > > > Instead of: > > > > def mul2(a, b): > > return a * b > > For such simple cases, yes. What about: > > button.click += def(obj): > # do stuff > > You obviously can't: > > def button.click(obj): > # do stuff > > :-) And if you make intermediate function and then assign it somewhere, > it "pollutes namespace": it's still left there, unneeded.
If you're really uptight about it you can def temp_function(...): .... button.click = temp_function del(temp_function) But for something like the example I'd probably just use a local name wherever the definition is needed; there's no namespace pollution in any meaningful sense then. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
