Terry Reedy wrote:
> Implementing a namespace as a Python object (ie, dict) is
> completely optional and implementation dependent. For CPython, the
> local namespace of a function is generally *not* done that way.
Sure, but this is all just theoretical talk anyway, right? I would
like to see more control over the name-binding operation, and exposing
the namespace as an object sounds like an interesting way to do this.
--
--OKB (not okblacke)
Brendan Barnwell
"Do not follow where the path may lead. Go, instead, where there is
no path, and leave a trail."
--author unknown
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
