"Fredrik Lundh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nick Vatamaniuc wrote: > > > At the same time one could claim that Python already has certain > > policies that makes it seem as if it has a component model. 8<----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> implementing this using existing mechanisms is trivial (as the endless > stream of interface/component/adapter/trait implementations have shown > us); coming up with a good-enough-to-be-useful-for-enough-people > vocabulary is a lot harder. not sure if its trivial - but agree about the generality - my meat is your poison effect operating here - and also - standards are not per se a *Good Thing* - they stifle both inventiveness and diversity... - Hendrik -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
