Ilias Lazaridis wrote: > Giovanni Bajo wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I just read this mail by Brett Cannon: >> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-October/069139.html >> where the "PSF infrastracture committee", after weeks of evaluation, >> recommends >> using a non open source tracker (called JIRA - never heard before of course) >> for Python itself. >> >> Does this smell "Bitkeeper fiasco" to anyone else than me? >> -- >> Giovanni Bajo > > Fascinating. > > The python foundation suggests a non-python non-open-source bugtracking > tool for python.
Actually, it suggests two bugtracking tools, one of them written in Python. > It's like saying: "The python community is not able to produce the > tools needed to drive development of python forward." No, it's saying: "if the Python community is able to provide the required amount of time to do the admin work, we'll use the tool written in Python." > Anyway. The whole selection process is intransparent. Steve has already pointed you to the wiki page. Georg -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list