Sybren Stuvel wrote: > I must say that the for/else construct is a LOT more readable than the > rewritten alternatives.
+1 I just wish it had a more intuitive name like "after:" or "then:", as "else:" seems like a choice between the loop and the other block (but really the choice is between StopIteration and break). Regards, Jordan -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
