Duncan Booth schreef:
> flupke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> Using 86400 instead of (24*60*60) is faster
> 
> s/is/was/
> 
> upgrade to Python 2.5

Indeed, i'm still on 2.4.
I thought 2.5 might give a different result :)

Thanks for the info
Benedict
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to