Duncan Booth schreef: > flupke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Using 86400 instead of (24*60*60) is faster > > s/is/was/ > > upgrade to Python 2.5
Indeed, i'm still on 2.4. I thought 2.5 might give a different result :) Thanks for the info Benedict -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list