Saizan wrote: > Well in boolean notation -True == False and -False == True, > actually you may prefer ¬ or a line over the term,
(I can't remember reading "-" (minus) for a standard boolean negation operator anywhere. Even C/C++ uses "!".) > but since there's no such operator in python I think we should > use "-" Stop! What about the "not" operator? It's Python's operator for negation. > which is also the operator used by Bool himself in his formulation > for negation which was 1-x. Boole's original formulation uses some weird mathematical things to emulate "not", "and" and "or". Focus lies on "mathematical" here. > Now that I think of it 1-x should work as a negation in Python, > too, since True == 1 and False == 0, but it would be a little > annoying to write expressions in this way. And "a little" unreadable ;) Regards, Björn -- BOFH excuse #445: Browser's cookie is corrupted -- someone's been nibbling on it. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
