Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> Steve Holden wrote:
>
>
>>And statements like that are probably going to annoy me ;-)
>>
>> >>> t = timeit.Timer("b = map(lambda x: x-1, a)", setup="a=[1,2,3]")
>> >>> t.timeit()
>>2.4686168214116599
>> >>> t = timeit.Timer("b = [x-1 for x in a]", setup="a=[1,2,3]")
>> >>> t.timeit()
>>0.9930245324475635
>> >>>
>
>
> And now someone's probably reading this and thinking that list comprehensions
> are *always* faster than "map"...
>
You are so right. So, let me repeat the important part that Fredrik
didn't quote:
"""if performance is *really* important, you
need to benchmark both options"""
regards
Steve
--
Steve Holden +44 150 684 7255 +1 800 494 3119
Holden Web LLC/Ltd http://www.holdenweb.com
Skype: holdenweb http://holdenweb.blogspot.com
Recent Ramblings http://del.icio.us/steve.holden
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
