Paul Rubin wrote: > "MonkeeSage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Ps. I don't know if xrange is faster...I thought the difference was > > that range created a temporary variable holding a range object and > > xrange created an iterator? > > There's no such thing as a "range object"; range creates a list, which > consumes O(n) memory where n is the number of elements. xrange > creates an xrange object, which is a reusable iterator of sorts.
Aha, thanks for explaining. :) Regards, Jordan -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
