On 1 Sep 2006 00:57:04 -0700, crystalattice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd write for 2.4, even though 2.5 should be coming out "shortly". > There aren't many significant changes to the whole language between 2.4 > and 2.5. Probably the best thing is write for 2.4 and have a sidenote > stating where 2.5 operates differently. > The Python 3 timeline is almost a moving target right now; personally, > I don't think it will be out before next winter. Maybe a beta but I > doubt the full version.
Maybe I forgot to tell, but its going to take me at least 6 month to finish the book, then there is a proofreading stage with the publisher and then the release, so it will take about 1 year (about end of 2007), that is why I am thinking in 2.5 and 3. What do you think about it? -- Bioinformatics news: http://www.bioinformatica.info Lriser: http://www.linspire.com/lraiser_success.php?serial=318 -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
