[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looks like you mixing comparisons.
> Ruby: > + More mature system. More stable? More features? uh, no, Python predates Ruby by a good bit Rails might be "older" than Turbogears but it still JUST went 1.0 officially. It can't be called "mature' by any defintition. > + Much better documented. This is a biggie. Rails has no documentation, period. The authors acknowledge this openly. > + Built-in Rubydoc system would make documenting the > system easier. (IMHO, developers almost always > underestimate the need for good documentation that > is written along withe the system.) Is there a > Python doc system that has received Guido's blessing > yet? D'oxygen would seem an obvious choice. Pydoc IS standard. This has been around for a long time. > + Better coordination with Javascript helper code? Again, is this a Python vs Ruby or Turbogears vs Rails post, you seem highly confused on the distinctions between language vs framework. > I was initially leaning towards Rails due to maturity, > but the most recent version of TurboGears seem to have > fixed a lot of the "ad hoc" feeling I got from previous > versions. But I'm still very much up in the air. > again, Ruby can't be considered 'mature' by any definition. > Thanks, > Ken > > P.S. If I wanted to provide an image by streaming the > file data directly over the connection, rather than by > referring to an image file, how would I do that? I'd > like to build code that would allow images to be assembled > into a single-file photo album (zip or bsddb file), and > so can't refer to them as individual image files. ?????? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
