[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > + Built-in Rubydoc system would make documenting the > system easier. (IMHO, developers almost always > underestimate the need for good documentation that > is written along withe the system.) Is there a > Python doc system that has received Guido's blessing > yet?
afaik, TurboGears has standardized on PythonDoc markup in docstrings: http://effbot.org/zone/pythondoc.htm > P.S. If I wanted to provide an image by streaming the > file data directly over the connection, rather than by > referring to an image file, how would I do that? I'd > like to build code that would allow images to be assembled > into a single-file photo album (zip or bsddb file), and > so can't refer to them as individual image files. some browsers support special data URL:s for images, but that doesn't work well for large images, and isn't portable. on the other hand, I don't really see why there has to be 1:1 mapping between URL:s and image files on your machine, especially if you're using a web application framework... </F> -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list