Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Certainly--I was not comparing 1000000 against 10000. Referring to the > OP's statement: "However, while the python code gave the result almost > instantly, the C++ code took several seconds to run!" 30ms sounds like > a definite improvement over several seconds!
Of course. I suppose there's something broken in OP's C++ setup (in fact the version I compiled with VCPP 2005 also takes a lot of seconds... something like 20-30 seconds, but of course this makes me think I haven't understood how it is supposed to work, since my gcc gives results comparable to yours). -- blog: http://www.akropolix.net/rik0/blogs | Uccidete i filosofi, site: http://www.akropolix.net/rik0/ | tenetevi riso e forum: http://www.akropolix.net/forum/ | bacchette per voi. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
