<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's to say, > python is still much faster?
Yes it is. But of course you can't sat that "Python is faster than C++". We found that the code to do this, written in the most natural way, is a lot faster in Python. However, if you optimze the code, C++ gets almost as fast. In other benchmarks C++ outperforms Python and is 10 or 100 times faster. > Maybe someone can post this to the c++ maillist and they will tell how > to accelerate it. There are enough C++ experts here to do it. The point is another. -- blog: http://www.akropolix.net/rik0/blogs | Uccidete i filosofi, site: http://www.akropolix.net/rik0/ | tenetevi riso e forum: http://www.akropolix.net/forum/ | bacchette per voi. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
