At Saturday 19/8/2006 07:49, Hendrik van Rooyen wrote:
Now how about introducing an index that works over time,
such that s{0} (the default so as to not break any existing code)
implies the current object bound to the name s,
with s{1} being the previous one, and so on...
Doing that *always* for *all* names would be ridiculous - objects
would never get garbage collected, by example. And
99.99999999999999999999% of programs don't need that behavior at all.
So just implement that for your use case - if you have any!
Gabriel Genellina
Softlab SRL
__________________________________________________
Preguntá. Respondé. Descubrí.
Todo lo que querías saber, y lo que ni imaginabas,
está en Yahoo! Respuestas (Beta).
¡Probalo ya!
http://www.yahoo.com.ar/respuestas
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
