[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Paul Rubin: > >>Sybren Stuvel: >> >>>Because of "there should only be one way to do it, and that way should >>>be obvious". There are already the str.join and unicode.join methods, >> >>Those are obvious??? > > > They aren't fully obvious (because they are methods of the separator > string), but after reading some documentation about string methods, and > after some tests done on the Python shell, you too can probably use > then without much problems. > Using a bound method can make it a little more obvious.
>>> cat = "".join >>> cat(['one', 'two', 'three']) 'onetwothree' >>> cat([u'one', u'two', u'three']) u'onetwothree' >>> regards Steve -- Steve Holden +44 150 684 7255 +1 800 494 3119 Holden Web LLC/Ltd http://www.holdenweb.com Skype: holdenweb http://holdenweb.blogspot.com Recent Ramblings http://del.icio.us/steve.holden -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
