It's just a bit heavy and why should one need a Java IDE for Python development ;-)
Another "issue" is the lack of integration with a UML tool (code generation and reverse engineering), though an ArgoUML plugin is in the making (not for eclipse).
btw What Web/XML plugins are you using with eclipse?
regards
Andre
On 15 Aug 2006 09:03:44 -0700,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've had a similar experience and tried about everything. Personally -
eclipse with PyDev has been the winner for me. I also still do a bunch
of Java coding - so there is an added benefit of one tool across
languages. The final thing I really like with eclipse is the svn
plugins - making life very easy. Also, if your doing web/xml and other
stuff - there is a plugin for eclipse for it ;) Not all the plugins
work as seemlessly together (i abandon eclipse for the majority of
plone/zope stuff - most of it isn't python - and setting up eclipse to
be happy with the output of archgen has not been worth the bother - I'm
sure it's possible)
PyLint can kind of be a pain if your on a low powered box, but tweaking
the settings (and I had to do a bit of tweaking) can alleviate the
problems, but still let you reap the benefits.
Anand
Yu-Xi Lim wrote:
> Michiel Sikma wrote:
> > By FOS, do you mean FOSS (Free and Open Source Software)? I've never
> > seen the acronym FOS used.
>
> Maybe he was trying for "Free Open Source IDE" without the
> semi-redundant "Software"
>
> > I personally use Eclipse with PyDev.
> > http://www.eclipse.org/
> > http://pydev.sourceforge.net/
>
> Eclipse+PyDev has the advantage over emacs when it comes to big
> projects, IMO. It has features like refactoring, better project
> management, code coverage. emacs has the advantage of being faster and
> smaller, and if all you need is a syntax-aware (smart indentation,
> syntax highlighting) editor and integrated debugger, emacs is more than
> enough.
>
> I've tried the other free IDEs like IDLE, SPE, eric3, TruStudio (for
> Eclipse), Boa, Komodo, WingIDE. I have various issues with them,
> including instability, poor automatic indentation, bad GUI (too many
> subwindows or uncustomizable), costly, no refactoring, and no project
> management.
>
> It's strangely ironic. I consider Eclipse to be a lousy Java IDE
> especially compared to commercial offerings and yet that's what the
> project started out as.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
--
Dr. Andre P. Meyer http://python.openspace.nl/meyer
TNO Defence, Security and Safety http://www.tno.nl/
Delft Cooperation on Intelligent Systems http://www.decis.nl/
Ah, this is obviously some strange usage of the word 'safe' that I wasn't previously aware of. - Douglas Adams
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
