Daniel,
I am using py2exe since more then 4 years, so I am rather biased.
I read PyInstaller page and was positively impressed by the manual and
all the good words.
There is one major difference which will keep me with py2exe:
with PyInstaller and single file there is:
"When first started, it finds that it needs to extract these files
before it can run "for real"."
and with py2exe:
Changes in 0.6.1:
* py2exe can now bundle binary extensions and dlls into the
library-archive or the executable itself. This allows to
finally build real single-file executables.
The bundled dlls and pyds are loaded at runtime by some special
code that emulates the Windows LoadLibrary function - they are
never unpacked to the file system.
this "they are never unpacked to the file system" is the USP of py2exe
to me at the moment.
What is less then optimal with both packages, is that MSVCR71.DLL needs
to be distributed separately :(
Harald
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
