Davor wrote:
so you get a nice program with separate data structures and functions that operate on these data structures, with modules as containers for both (again ideally separated). Very simple to do and maintain [...]
Replace "modules" with "classes" in the above quote, and you have the very essence of object-oriented programming.
(What you describe here *is* object-oriented programming, you're just trying to avoid the 'class' statement and use module-objects where 'traditional' OO would use class instances.)
Jeff Shannon Technician/Programmer Credit International
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
