> Actually, the code in the book is: > > def f1(): > x = 88 > f2(x) > > def f2(x): > print x > > f1() > > which makes all the difference in the world. Not to mention that this > particular section of the book is giving an example of how to write the > code *without* using nested functions.
Ouch! You got me there, I did not copy the code properly. Now I feel stupid. Thanks for the enlightment. I think I am starting to get it. Sébastien. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list