Nick Craig-Wood wrote:
Robin Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Paul Rubin wrote:

"Reed L. O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


I see rotor was removed for 2.4 and the docs say use an AES module
provided separately...  Is there a standard module that works alike or
an AES module that works alike but with better encryption?


If you mean a module in the distribution, the answer is no, for
political reasons.


.....I'm also missing the rotor module and regret that something useful was warned about and now removed with no plugin replacement.


I had understood that this was because rotor was insecure, but you mention politics. Are other useful modules to suffer from politics?

...
Presumably he is talking about crypo-export rules.  In the past strong
cryptography has been treated as munitions, and as such exporting it
(especially from the USA) could have got you into very serious
trouble.

well since rotor is a german (1930's) invention it is a bit late for Amricans (Hollywood notwithstanding) to be worried about its export


However I believe those restrictions have been lifted (the cat having
been let out of the bag somewhat ;-), and its easy to do this for open
source encryption software.  A wade through


-- Robin Becker -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to