Hmmmm. Not familiar with erlang at all...
> Subject: Re: OCAMl a more natural extension language for python?
>
> Hi !
>
> OCAML is very complementary at Python :
>
> unreadable vs readable
That's depending on how you compare; I find OCAML quite readable
compared to C / Fortran
> functionnel vs procedural/POO/etc.
OCAML is not a true functional language, its also OO
> compiled vs interpreted (or compil JIT)
> very fast vs mean velocity
What I'm looking for!
> hard to learn vs easy to easy to learn
Is it in comparison to C?
> Yes, OCAML is very complementary, too much, much too, complementary at
> Python...
>
> But, C is not complementary to Python (in the same state of mind).
So some additional arguments to the hypotheses of OCAMl being a
natural extension language to Python?
Cheers,
Jelle.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
