>Before you get too carried away, how often do you want to do this and >how grunty is the box you will be running on?
Oops, I should have specified this. The script will only need to be run once every three or four months, when the sequences are updated. I'll be running it on boxes that are 3GHz/100GB Ram, but others may not be so fortunate, and so I'd like to keep that in mind. >BTW, you need to clarify "don't have access to an RDBMS" ... surely >this can only be due to someone stopping them from installing good >free software freely available on the Internet. I understand your and others' sentiment on this. I agree, the open-source database systems are wonderful. However, keeping it Python-only saves me hassle by only having to assist in instances where others need help downloading and installing Python. I suppose if I keep it in Python, I can even use Py2exe to generate an executable that wouldn't even require them to install Python. A solution using interaction with a database is much sexier, but, for the purposes of the script, seems unnecesary. However, I certainly appreciate the suggestions. >My guess is that you don't need anything much fancier than the >effbot's index method -- which by now you have probably found works >straight out of the box and is more than fast enough for your needs. I think Mr. Lundh's code will work very well for these purposes. Thanks very much to him for posting it. Many thanks for posting that! You'll have full credit for that part of the code. Thanks very much to all who replied! Chris -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
