I still wonder why a concept like "references" was not implemented in Python. I think it is (even if small) an overhead to wrap an object in a list or a dictionary.
Isn't it possible to extend Python in a way to use real references? Or isn't that regarded as necessary?
IMHO it's not really necessary. As long as you're passing a mutable object around, when you call one of its methods, the object will be changed. So the only time you'd want a "reference" is if you were passing around an immutable object (e.g. an int, float, str or tuple) and you wanted to change it. The thought of changing an immutable object seems kind of silly to me. ;)
Could you give us a more concrete use case? My suspicion is that anything complicated enough to be passed to a method to be modified will probably be more than a simple int, float, str or tuple... In which case, it will probably have methods to allow you to update it...
In my case, rather than your original example, which you want to look something like:
def func(x):
x += 123 x = 5
func(x)I'd just write:
x = 5
x += 123=)
Steve -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
