Alex Martelli wrote:
I wonder if 'with', which GvR is already on record as wanting to
introduce in 3.0, might not be overloaded instead.

Perhaps we could steal 'using' from the rejected decorator syntax.

x = [f(x) for x in seq] using:
  def f(x):
    return x * x

Cheers,
Nick.

--
Nick Coghlan   |   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |   Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
            http://boredomandlaziness.skystorm.net
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to