"Terry Reedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Which I find again wrong: suppose this developer used GPL-ed > > library A, developed patches B and C. He provided you with > > the source code of publicly available library A and a patch > > C, but he doesn't want to release patch B. > > Then he does not have to. As I understand the GPL, as long as he does not > release (distribute) the patch in any form (in particular, binary), then > the GPL has no effect.
I think the hypothesis is that the developer distributed the patched library. The GPL then requires distributing source for all the patches. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
