Roman Suzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alex, I think you are +10 for adding interfaces into Python. "Concept" > is more compact word and I am sure it is not used as a name in existing > projects, unlike other words.
Actually, I want protocols -- semantics (and pragmatics), too, not just syntax (method names and signatures). Eby's PyProtocols comes closest to my desiderata (though it possibly exceeds them). But if you start coding a PyConcepts alternative to PyProtocols I'll be delighted to try it out, contribute, &c -- I won't be a stickler for the name. Indeed, "protocol" is no doubt more overloaded, since it's an established name in networking, and if you google for "protocol adaptation" you get a mix mostly related to networking with a few examples of the way PEP 246 uses the phrase thrown in;-). Alex -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
