On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 18:54:06 GMT, Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Roman Suzi wrote:
I wish lambdas will not be deprecated in Python but the key to that is dropping the keyword (lambda). If anybody could think of a better syntax for lambdas _with_ arguments, we could develop PEP 312 further.
Some suggestions from recent lambda threads (I only considered the ones that keep lambda as an expression):
Just for reference, am I correct in assuming these are the equivalent uses of lambda?:
lambda a, b, c:f(a) + o(b) - o(c) lambda x: x * x lambda : x lambda *a, **k: x.bar(*a, **k) (lambda : x(*a, **k)) for x, a, k in funcs_and_args_list)
Yeah, I believe that was the intention, though I stole the examples from [1].
That last seems like it might need the default-arg-value hack: i.e., (lambda x=x, a=a, k=k: x(*a, **k)) for x, a, k in funcs_and_args_list)
Good point.
Steve -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
