Steve Holden wrote:
Aahz wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Aahz wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Paul Rubin <http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was pretty skeptical of Java's checked exceptions when I first used
them but have been coming around about them. [...]
That's funny -- Bruce Eckel talks about how he used to love checked
exceptions but has come to regard them as the horror that they are.
I've learned to just write "throws Exception" at the declaration of
every method.
Pretty sloppy, though, no? And surely the important thing is to have
a broad handler, not a broad specification of raisable exceptions?
Yes, it's sloppy, but I Don't Care. I'm trying to write usable code
while learning a damnably under-documented Java library -- and I'm *not*
a Java programmer in the first place, so I'm also fighting with the Java
environment. Eventually I'll add in some better code.
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Hmm ... those must be what my bucket keeps bumping over! :)
Steve W.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
