On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 13:05:48 +0200, Ville Vainio wrote: >>>>>> "jfj" == jfj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > jfj> There were functional and non-functional programming > jfj> languages (the first being *much* simpler to > jfj> implement). There is a *reason* people chose C over > jfj> lisp. It's not that we were all blind and didn't see the > jfj> amazingness of lisp. Procedural languages are simply better, > jfj> and I'm not replying to this flamewar. > > You did already ;). Lisp is not a functional programming language, if > that was the case it would be even less popular than it is now. Lisp > had it's heyday, while pure FP languages didn't even have that much. > > Hey, it's 2005, I don't think we've used up our yearly Lisp flamewar > quota yet.
Lisp will strike back! Someday, it will be popular again! When all else is dust, Lisp will rule the skies! In the meantime, let's do Python. -- Christopher [EMAIL PROTECTED] # python Python inf (day 1) [PyPy inf (Pythonix inf)] on pynuxinf Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> from Creation import lux >>> lux.fiat() -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
