Bengt Richter:
> OTOH, there is precedent in e.g. fortran (IIRC) for named operators of the
> form .XX. -- e.g., .GE. for >= so maybe there could be room for both.
> Hm, you could make
>
> x .infix. y
> x .op1. y .op2. z => op2(op1(x, y), z)
The problem being that that's already legal syntax
>>> class Xyzzy:
... def __init__(self):
... self.op1 = self.op2 = self.y = self
... self.z = "Nothing happens here"
...
>>> x = Xyzzy()
>>> x .op1. y .op2. z
'Nothing happens here'
>>>
Andrew
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
