Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > IMHO this too easy to accomplish right now to warrant > > an "official" implementation: > > class Bunch: > > pass > > b = Bunch() > > b.one, b.two, b.three = 1,2,3 > > works just fine, depending on the problem I might add a few special > > operators. For anything more complicated I'd rather write a real class. > ... > The belief that I gathered from the end of the previous thread > discussing this (check last week's python-list I think) was that there > were a significant number of people who had wanted a class like this > (notably IPython), and more than one of them had rewritten the class a > few times.
I've written that class more than a few times myself, and ended up adding operations to print the objects (show the member values), serialize them (don't output any member whose name starts with _), etc. I think it would be worthwhile to standardize something like this. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
