On Mon, 2 May 2022 at 16:46, Serhiy Storchaka <[email protected]> wrote: > > 02.05.22 08:03, Chris Angelico пише: > > Let's not go as far as a PEP yet, and figure out a couple of things: > > A PEP is necessary if we add Roman numerals and Cyrillic numerals, and > Babylonian cuneiform numerals to the heap. >
I'm aware of PEP 313 for Roman, but not for the others. Was there a PEP when the int() constructor started to support other types of digits? I can't find one but it wouldn't surprise me. In any case, I just said "yet" - there's no need to go straight to the PEP stage, even if it's necessary before the matter gets finally decided. (This was said with my PEP Editor hat on; every now and then, we get someone putting a PR on the peps repository to request a change in the language, and it's usually better to thrash things out on a mailing list first.) ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/RJXFLVXUFQXRFQRJTQNGJILBM5Y5PNZ5/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
