Michael Smith writes:
> This is just a small improvement, but worthwhile. It's intuitive IMO to be
> able to use similar filtering expressions to comprehensions at the top of a
> for loop.
Intuitive I guess, but in comprehensions it was "strictly from need"
since comprehension syntax is an expression. There is no other way to
explicitly filter in comprehensions. (One could write a generator
function to do the filtering, but "explicit is better ...".)
> Here's an example:
>
> for path in Path("pyspark/jars")).glob("hadoop-*.jar") if not
> path.stem.startswith("hadoop-shaded-guava"):
"Bad MUA! Bad, bad MUA! You know you're not supposed to respect line
length constraints when somebody's trying to make a point."
My 63-year-old eyes struggle with 80-character lines, but in all
fairness to those with better eyesight I'm not going to argue for
Mom's 65[1]. But 106 (and that's assuming this is top-level
"scripting" code) would get a "restructure and resubmit" from me.
Footnotes:
[1] The number of characters produced by my Mom's typewriter with
6.5" lines.
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/UEYEC4ZS2AHEMM4O7UXTZLUJEDMAK5QF/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
