Exactly like you. I can read => to mean late-bound or supposedly lambda function and I can distinguish it from the callable typing -> but "@param=value” is definitely better in my eyes. => won’t prevent me from using it for default mutable objects.
> On 2 Dec 2021, at 3:45 AM, Jeremiah Vivian <[email protected]> > wrote: > > To be honest, I like the `@param=value` syntax. It is sort of easier to read > than `param=>value`, though I do not have problems with distinguishing the > arrow `=>` from other things.
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/DBPTFRTSYQ66D6MEZDNCSBPHO5ODC46Y/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
