Hi Paul, all,
Am 15.10.21 um 18:49 schrieb Paul Moore:
> Mypy correctly rejects this:
> [...]
interesting. Thanks for trying.
> If typeguard doesn't, maybe you need to raise that as a bug against
> that project?
This is kind of contradicting the design of typeguard. It works on a
call level checking arguments and return values for the most part.
Typeguard does not provide any form of type inference like mypy does.
>From this perspective, typeguard would need to guard `dict.__init__`,
`dict.__setitem__`, `dict.update` and friends directly, essentially
requiring a subclass of `dict` of some sort.
However, typeguard does have a special function to perform type checks
on objects, e.g. `check_type('variablename', [1234], List[int])`
Ignoring typeguard, my suggestion still stands, although slightly
changed: Annotating a dictionary as described earlier in such a way that
type inference is not required OR in such a way that run-time checkers
have a chance to work more easily - if this makes any sense at all?
Best regards,
Sebastian
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/MNTNS2H27GKQP7SJOYCVGL4ZFA73SLPA/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
