On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 4:19 PM Steven D'Aprano <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 02:09:03PM -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > Over in typing-sig we're considering a new syntax for callable *types*, > > which would look like (int, int, str) -> float. A matching syntax for > > lambda would use a different arrow, e.g. (x, y, z) => x+y+z. > > I like arrow operators :-) > > But I fear that it will be too easy to misread `=>` as greater than or > equal to, especially when skimming code. > > Assuming that they need to be different arrows, how do you feel about > `->` for types and annotations, and `-->` for lambdas? Or `->>`? >
JavaScript uses => for functions, and the confusion with ">=" doesn't seem to be a major problem with it. ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/J324OIOUPWMXX5KTYRXZ5YBBQR5Q5KST/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
