I'm not sure if you're reading the right document, but PEP 634 refers to 636 in its second paragraph
On Tue, 4 May 2021, 19:56 Shreyan Avigyan, <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok. Now I'm able to understand. PEP 634 should have a reference to PEP 636 > or else it's pretty hard to understand because the syntax section > demonstrates PEG implementation of this. > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/APKN7AV5TLLNSO3EHLK2MBEEBCB5NMEF/ > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/S5TJBM3TD4X6GUSJI5ERITIZIDCX5536/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
