David Mertz writes:
> It's cute.
Cute is for bunnies and Ghibli anime. :-)
> And really quite readable. But it's not writeable.
Heh. They look like misplaced apostrophes on my screen in my English
buffers. I'd have to go to a 1.3x (maybe 1.5x) font to be sure what
I'm looking at. And I'm an Emacs user, so if I wanted to use this
feature (I don't though, I think it's ugly), I'd rebind Ctrl-<single
digit> to the superscripts. (I have a little sympathy for non-Emacs
users, but really, America, wake up. Characters are good, use more!)
So my reaction is the opposite of yours.
I prefer the arbitrary tag, where I read
for i in iterable as breakable:
as "with (for i in iterable) as breakable" in my head. Although I'm
basically -0.0 on the whole idea, in my experience anyway it's YAGNI.
Steve
--
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
What are those straight lines? "Diversity rules."
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/W6XUXDOMPKNBG3LYXYP5FSLB7ZNWTRQ3/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
