On Sat, Oct 24, 2020, 3:47 PM Daniel Moisset <[email protected]> wrote:

> If you find PEP-634 a bit dry, you might give a try to PEP-636 (written in
> an explanatory style rather than a hard-spec style). You can always go back
> to PEP-634 for the precise details.
>

Thank you that looks really helpful!
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/CP66MHK3P65MIABLBE2O4IZBQVOKALX7/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to