On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 10:22 AM Steven D'Aprano <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Well... yes. And oddly enough, developing a scanning mini-language
> > inspired by the formatting language is *exactly* what this proposal
> > is, and has always been.
>
> That's incorrect.
>
> The first post in this thread:
>
> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/thread/JEGSKODAK5MCO2HHUF4555JZPZ6SKNEC/
>
> literally describes it as f-strings as the target. There's no hint that
> only a subset of f-string functionality will be accepted. Dennis says:
>
> "you can assign a string to an f-string"
>
> and proposes an exception:
>
> "ValueError: f-string assignment target does not match ..."

The first post was just talking about the syntactic concept, without
any explanation of how an f-string match pattern would work. Once we
got to actual concrete proposals, they were always about a scanning
mini-language inspired by the formatting language. I'm really not sure
what you're arguing here.

> I think we have at least six mini-languages now?
>
> - regexes
> - string interpolation with %
> - template strings
> - format mini-language
> - f-strings
> - date/time format strings
>
> I think it would be quite an uphill battle to have a seventh built into
> the language. You're welcome to write a PEP :-)
>

If you're going to count date/time format strings, you should also
count logging formats, and a ton of other things around the place.
Mini-languages aren't a problem. They're just a compact form of
structured data (or code, depending on your context). What's the issue
here?

Remember, this is *closely related to* an existing one, meaning that
it won't have the cognitive load of a complete new system.

ChrisA
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/ZZXV6K7SHVUHKVYA4FVFRLFJW6O6S47H/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to