On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 3:09 AM Random832 <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2020, at 12:45, Cade Brown wrote: > > I am positing that Python should contain a constant (similar to True, > > False, None), called Infinity. > > What if we created a new syntax [and used it for the repr] that is not > currently a valid identifier? > > something like "1.INF" > This is out of the box and might be considered insane, but what about: >>> INF# INF# >>> INF # this is a comment as usual NameError: INF But I suppose this would be considered a breaking change, since the text "INF#" probably exists in code somewhere. --- Ricky. "I've never met a Kentucky man who wasn't either thinking about going home or actually going home." - Happy Chandler
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/VAJC2IEAQ4CHVE24JLZOYPYGIRHSOWGG/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
