On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 10:36 PM Rob Cliffe <[email protected]> wrote: > OK, some of the arguments are a bit exaggerated. (This can be corrected.) > But this is not an objection to the PEP per se, just to the way some of the > arguments are worded. >
Or, looking at that differently: It's an objection to the PEP, not to the proposal. That means that, if someone words up better arguments, the PEP might be better received. Hence, reopening the PEP basically means figuring out what arguments should be put forward. ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/5QACAS2RQWHRJUCK5LRLT5LCNLFXREGN/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
