It's a discussion issue. PEP 554 is trying to focus on the API of subinterpreters and doesn't want to distract from that by bringing the GIL into it.
That being said, the general expectation from everyone involved is there will be a perl-interpreter GIL. On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 10:31 AM Denis Kotov <[email protected]> wrote: > Reading PEP554 > https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0554/#a-disclaimer-about-the-gil > seems like at the current implementation of subinterpretters there will be > no separate GIL … > > > > But I am wondering, why ? > > Each subinterpreter has it own object management and Garbage Collection … > > > > Why subinterpreters should share one GIL ? > > Is there any technical issues ? > > > > Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for > Windows 10 > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/ZC3WVJKNNIQNQLPLLTMDLU6SHTNYZ4ID/ > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/H5XRPUVM66KSINNODHIQC5YU6VUOUV3A/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
