On 28/04/2020 15:46, Brandt Bucher wrote:
Thanks for weighing in, everybody.
Over the course of the last week, it has become surprisingly clear that this
change is controversial enough to require a PEP.
With that in mind, I've started drafting one summarizing the discussion that
took place here, and arguing for the addition of a boolean flag to the `zip`
constructor. Antoine Pitrou has agreed to sponsor, and I've chatted with
another core developer who shares my view that such a flag wouldn't violate
Python's existing design philosophies.
I'll be watching this thread, and should have a draft posted to the list for
feedback this week.
-1 on the flag. I'd be happy to have a separate zip_strict() (however
you spell it), but behaviour switches just smell wrong.
--
Rhodri James *-* Kynesim Ltd
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/BZUJUTAVOHJEUZ6QEIRZWZHKCRXE6AAS/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/