Thank you Kyle and everyone else who chimed in here. I’ve made a post to the python-dev mailing list - it has yet to appear, but perhaps it’s in a moderation queue. I’ll ensure it’s posted tomorrow.
Tom > On 27 Apr 2020, at 21:56, Kyle Stanley <[email protected]> wrote: > > Christopher Barker wrote: >> Is there a core developer with a particular interest in functools to be >> consulted? > > Yep, Raymond Hettinger is the designated expert for the functools > module. See https://devguide.python.org/experts/#stdlib. I'm not sure > as to whether he regularly checks python-ideas, but I suspect he would > definitely notice a python-dev thread. Other core developers with some > experience in this domain would also likely chime in. > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 4:46 PM Christopher Barker <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:26 PM Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> My own opinion is that it's limited enough in scope (and probably >>> uncontroversial implementation-wise) that it doesn't need a PEP. Of >>> course other core developers may disagree, so perhaps wait a few days >>> before submitting a PR :-) >> >> >> Is there a core developer with a particular interest in functools to be >> consulted? >> >> -CHB >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Antoine. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 20:16:53 +0100 >>> Tom Forbes <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> I would think that would be a great name, it’s more explicit and fits more >>>> in with its siblings “lru_cache” and “cached_property”. >>>> >>>> Not to imply that there is a consensus to move forward, I would be >>>> interested in knowing what the next steps would be if there was. Would >>>> this require a PEP to be submitted? Or is it similar enough to existing >>>> functionality that it might not require one? >>>> >>>>> On 27 Apr 2020, at 19:37, Antoine Pitrou >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 09:26:53 -0700 >>>>> Ethan Furman <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Or are you saying that once could be interpreted to mean I cannot do >>>>>>> that 2nd def? >>>>>> >>>>>> That is what I was saying -- that `once`, all by itself, could mean >>>>>> multiple things. >>>>> >>>>> That's a good point. A more explicit spelling would be `@call_once`, >>>>> what do you think? >>>>> >>>>> (that's also the C++ spelling, incidentally, but I suspect most >>>>> beginners won't care about that ;-)) >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> >>>>> Antoine. >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Python-ideas mailing list -- >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ >>>>> Message archived at >>>>> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/NYOB46XXHLPDK3V7IPQL6IJ6FNE2ZK7S/ >>>>> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected] >>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >>> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ >>> Message archived at >>> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/BJ7MPRTG7EL3LD4FUWG63XPRLCWEPQH7/ >>> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >> >> >> >> -- >> Christopher Barker, PhD >> >> Python Language Consulting >> - Teaching >> - Scientific Software Development >> - Desktop GUI and Web Development >> - wxPython, numpy, scipy, Cython >> _______________________________________________ >> Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected] >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ >> Message archived at >> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/KVXXHFTLQN76BD2V74SBUVKO5QOZUNRL/ >> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/4WJ42AQE5NCUQK6BW66R6OQNMWPWXTXD/ > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/QH6QX6C5TNAQVBEFYRA23SSDRJDYIQ4B/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
