On Apr 22, 2020, at 15:04, [email protected] wrote: > > The natural extension to this filtering idea are convenience args that set > two const values (eg: `--filter x --filter y` being equivalent to > `--filter-x-y`), but there is no `extend_const` action to enable this. > > While this is possible (and rather straight forward) to add via a custom > action, I feel like this should be a built-in action instead. `append` has > `append_const`, it seems intuitive and reasonable to expect `extend` to have > `extend_const` too (my anecdotal experience the first time I came across this > need was that I simply tried using `extend_const` without checking the docs, > assuming it already existed).
I’m pretty sure I’ve run into the exact same situation (well, not accumulating filters, but accumulating something and wanting to add multiple constants from one flag), had the same “Really? It’s not there?” reaction as you, and then just muttered and worked around it. It makes sense to me to fix it, exactly the way you propose. My only comment is that when you write the example(s) for the docs, it might be worth using a tuple rather than a list for the const value. It doesn’t really make a difference, but people might be momentarily confused by a mutable list called “const”. Also, looking at the _copy_items function you’re calling: it has a comment saying it’s only used by append and append_const, but that’s wrong as it’s also used by extend. And of course you’re adding extend_const. I don’t know if that’s worth fixing separately, but if not it seems to me it’s probably worth fixing in your patch. _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/VGXVYH5ICUJSMMWWZZGBDHBUIYFA5IWT/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
